Comparison

Filetti di Alici vs Filetti di alici

Overall, Filetti di alici has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFiletti di AliciFiletti di alici
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 256 kcal 188 kcal
Fat 16 g 10 g
Saturated fat 2.9 g 2.2 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 12.8 g 16 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 28 g 24 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Filetti di alici has 27% fewer calories (188 kcal vs 256 kcal).
  • Filetti di alici has 38% less fat (10 g vs 16 g).
  • Filetti di alici has 24% less saturated fat (2.2 g vs 2.9 g).
  • Filetti di Alici has 20% less salt (12.8 g vs 16 g).
  • Filetti di Alici has 14% more protein (28 g vs 24 g).
  • Only Filetti di alici lists: Fish.

Ingredients

Filetti di Alici

Filetti di alici, olio di oliva, sale.

Filetti di alici

Filetti di alici (Engraulis encrasicolus), olio d'oliva 45%, sale.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Filetti di Alici or Filetti di alici?

Overall, Filetti di alici has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filetti di alici has fewer calories: 188 kcal versus 256 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Filetti di Alici has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons