Filetti di Alici vs Filetti di alici
Overall, Filetti di alici has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filetti di Alici | Filetti di alici |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 256 kcal | 222 kcal |
| Fat | 16 g | 11.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.9 g | 2.3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 12.8 g | 12.6 g |
| Protein | 28 g | 28.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filetti di alici has 13% fewer calories (222 kcal vs 256 kcal).
- Filetti di alici has 26% less fat (11.8 g vs 16 g).
- Filetti di alici has 21% less saturated fat (2.3 g vs 2.9 g).
- Only Filetti di alici lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Filetti di Alici
Filetti di alici, olio di oliva, sale.
Filetti di alici
ACCIUGHE (Engraulis encrasicholus), olio di oliva, sale, chiodo di garofano. Semiconserva
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filetti di Alici or Filetti di alici?
Overall, Filetti di alici has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filetti di alici has fewer calories: 222 kcal versus 256 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filetti di Alici has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.