Filetti di alici vs Filetti di alici
Overall, Filetti di alici has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filetti di alici | Filetti di alici |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 222 kcal | 462 kcal |
| Fat | 11.8 g | 46 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.3 g | 5.2 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.7 g |
| Salt | 12.6 g | 9.2 g |
| Protein | 28.9 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filetti di alici has 52% fewer calories (222 kcal vs 462 kcal).
- Filetti di alici has 74% less fat (11.8 g vs 46 g).
- Filetti di alici has 56% less saturated fat (2.3 g vs 5.2 g).
- Filetti di alici has no sugar, while Filetti di alici has 0.7 g.
- Filetti di alici has 27% less salt (9.2 g vs 12.6 g).
- Filetti di alici has 58% more protein (28.9 g vs 12 g).
- Only Filetti di alici lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Filetti di alici
ACCIUGHE (Engraulis encrasicholus), olio di oliva, sale, chiodo di garofano. Semiconserva
Filetti di alici
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filetti di alici or Filetti di alici?
Overall, Filetti di alici has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filetti di alici has fewer calories: 222 kcal versus 462 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filetti di alici has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.