Comparison

Filetti di alici vs Filetti di alici

Overall, Filetti di alici has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFiletti di aliciFiletti di alici
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 222 kcal 462 kcal
Fat 11.8 g 46 g
Saturated fat 2.3 g 5.2 g
Sugars 0 g 0.7 g
Salt 12.6 g 9.2 g
Protein 28.9 g 12 g
Additives00
AllergensFishNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Filetti di alici has 52% fewer calories (222 kcal vs 462 kcal).
  • Filetti di alici has 74% less fat (11.8 g vs 46 g).
  • Filetti di alici has 56% less saturated fat (2.3 g vs 5.2 g).
  • Filetti di alici has no sugar, while Filetti di alici has 0.7 g.
  • Filetti di alici has 27% less salt (9.2 g vs 12.6 g).
  • Filetti di alici has 58% more protein (28.9 g vs 12 g).
  • Only Filetti di alici lists: Fish.

Ingredients

Filetti di alici

ACCIUGHE (Engraulis encrasicholus), olio di oliva, sale, chiodo di garofano. Semiconserva

Filetti di alici

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Filetti di alici or Filetti di alici?

Overall, Filetti di alici has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filetti di alici has fewer calories: 222 kcal versus 462 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Filetti di alici has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons