Filetti di Alici vs Filetti di alici
Overall, Filetti di Alici has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filetti di Alici | Filetti di alici |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 256 kcal | 462 kcal |
| Fat | 16 g | 46 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.9 g | 5.2 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.7 g |
| Salt | 12.8 g | 9.2 g |
| Protein | 28 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filetti di Alici has 45% fewer calories (256 kcal vs 462 kcal).
- Filetti di Alici has 65% less fat (16 g vs 46 g).
- Filetti di Alici has 44% less saturated fat (2.9 g vs 5.2 g).
- Filetti di Alici has no sugar, while Filetti di alici has 0.7 g.
- Filetti di alici has 28% less salt (9.2 g vs 12.8 g).
- Filetti di Alici has 57% more protein (28 g vs 12 g).
Ingredients
Filetti di Alici
Filetti di alici, olio di oliva, sale.
Filetti di alici
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filetti di Alici or Filetti di alici?
Overall, Filetti di Alici has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filetti di Alici has fewer calories: 256 kcal versus 462 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filetti di Alici has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.