Filetti di alici vs Filetti di alici
Overall, Filetti di alici has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filetti di alici | Filetti di alici |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 449 kcal | 462 kcal |
| Fat | 42 g | 46 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.4 g | 5.2 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.7 g |
| Salt | 10 g | 9.2 g |
| Protein | 19 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filetti di alici has 73% less saturated fat (1.4 g vs 5.2 g).
- Filetti di alici has no sugar, while Filetti di alici has 0.7 g.
- Filetti di alici has 37% more protein (19 g vs 12 g).
Ingredients
Filetti di alici
Not available.
Filetti di alici
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filetti di alici or Filetti di alici?
Overall, Filetti di alici has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filetti di alici has fewer calories: 449 kcal versus 462 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filetti di alici has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.