Comparison

Filetti di alici vs Filetti di alici

Overall, Filetti di alici has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFiletti di aliciFiletti di alici
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group — 3
Calories 449 kcal 188 kcal
Fat 42 g 10 g
Saturated fat 1.4 g 2.2 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 10 g 16 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 19 g 24 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Filetti di alici has 58% fewer calories (188 kcal vs 449 kcal).
  • Filetti di alici has 76% less fat (10 g vs 42 g).
  • Filetti di alici has 36% less saturated fat (1.4 g vs 2.2 g).
  • Filetti di alici has 38% less salt (10 g vs 16 g).
  • Filetti di alici has 21% more protein (24 g vs 19 g).
  • Only Filetti di alici lists: Fish.

Ingredients

Filetti di alici

Not available.

Filetti di alici

Filetti di alici (Engraulis encrasicolus), olio d'oliva 45%, sale.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Filetti di alici or Filetti di alici?

Overall, Filetti di alici has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filetti di alici has fewer calories: 188 kcal versus 449 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Filetti di alici has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons