Filetti di alici vs Filetti di alici
Overall, Filetti di alici has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filetti di alici | Filetti di alici |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 449 kcal | 188 kcal |
| Fat | 42 g | 10 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.4 g | 2.2 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 10 g | 16 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 19 g | 24 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filetti di alici has 58% fewer calories (188 kcal vs 449 kcal).
- Filetti di alici has 76% less fat (10 g vs 42 g).
- Filetti di alici has 36% less saturated fat (1.4 g vs 2.2 g).
- Filetti di alici has 38% less salt (10 g vs 16 g).
- Filetti di alici has 21% more protein (24 g vs 19 g).
- Only Filetti di alici lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Filetti di alici
Not available.
Filetti di alici
Filetti di alici (Engraulis encrasicolus), olio d'oliva 45%, sale.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filetti di alici or Filetti di alici?
Overall, Filetti di alici has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filetti di alici has fewer calories: 188 kcal versus 449 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filetti di alici has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.