Comparison

Filets de maquereaux à la moutarde de Dijon bio vs Skinless And Boneless Mackerel Fillets

Overall, Skinless And Boneless Mackerel Fillets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFilets de maquereaux à la mo...Skinless And Boneless Macker...
Nutri-Score d c
NOVA group — —
Calories 203 kcal 131 kcal
Fat 15.9 g 8.5 g
Saturated fat 3.5 g 3 g
Sugars 0.5 g 3.1 g
Salt 1.2 g 1.2 g
Fiber — 0.4 g
Protein 13.9 g 8.8 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Skinless And Boneless Mackerel Fillets has 35% fewer calories (131 kcal vs 203 kcal).
  • Skinless And Boneless Mackerel Fillets has 47% less fat (8.5 g vs 15.9 g).
  • Skinless And Boneless Mackerel Fillets has 14% less saturated fat (3 g vs 3.5 g).
  • Filets de maquereaux à la moutarde de Dijon bio has 84% less sugar (0.5 g vs 3.1 g).
  • Filets de maquereaux à la moutarde de Dijon bio has 37% more protein (13.9 g vs 8.8 g).
  • Skinless And Boneless Mackerel Fillets has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Filets de maquereaux à la moutarde de Dijon bio

Not available.

Skinless And Boneless Mackerel Fillets

Prunes het 90 ++ 91 B 10F5 A-DAY V VEGAN 2 SERVINGS Energy kJ Energy kcal Nutrition Typical values per 100g Carbohydrate of which Fat

FAQ

Which is healthier: Filets de maquereaux à la moutarde de Dijon bio or Skinless And Boneless Mackerel Fillets?

Overall, Skinless And Boneless Mackerel Fillets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Skinless And Boneless Mackerel Fillets has fewer calories: 131 kcal versus 203 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Filets de maquereaux à la moutarde de Dijon bio has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 3.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons