Filets de carrelets vs Filets de carrelets
Overall, Filets de carrelets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filets de carrelets | Filets de carrelets |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 89 kcal | 88 kcal |
| Fat | 1.9 g | 1.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 18 g | 18 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filets de carrelets has 21% less fat (1.5 g vs 1.9 g).
- Filets de carrelets has no saturated fat, while Filets de carrelets has 0.5 g.
- Filets de carrelets has no sugar, while Filets de carrelets has 0.5 g.
- Only Filets de carrelets lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Filets de carrelets
Not available.
Filets de carrelets
filets de carrelet (Pleuronectes platessa), eau.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filets de carrelets or Filets de carrelets?
Overall, Filets de carrelets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filets de carrelets has fewer calories: 88 kcal versus 89 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filets de carrelets has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.