Comparison

Filet de carrelet MSC vs Filets de carrelets

Overall, Filet de carrelet MSC has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFilet de carrelet MSCFilets de carrelets
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group — 1
Calories 63 kcal 88 kcal
Fat 0.6 g 1.5 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.5 g
Sugars 0 g 0.5 g
Salt 0 g 0.2 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 14.4 g 18 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Filet de carrelet MSC has 28% fewer calories (63 kcal vs 88 kcal).
  • Filet de carrelet MSC has 60% less fat (0.6 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Filet de carrelet MSC has no saturated fat, while Filets de carrelets has 0.5 g.
  • Filet de carrelet MSC has no sugar, while Filets de carrelets has 0.5 g.
  • Filets de carrelets has 20% more protein (18 g vs 14.4 g).
  • Only Filets de carrelets lists: Fish.

Ingredients

Filet de carrelet MSC

Not available.

Filets de carrelets

filets de carrelet (Pleuronectes platessa), eau.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Filet de carrelet MSC or Filets de carrelets?

Overall, Filet de carrelet MSC has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filet de carrelet MSC has fewer calories: 63 kcal versus 88 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Filet de carrelet MSC has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons