Filet de carrelet MSC vs Filet de carrelet
Overall, Filet de carrelet MSC has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filet de carrelet MSC | Filet de carrelet |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 63 kcal | 76 kcal |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 1.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 14.4 g | 16 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filet de carrelet MSC has 17% fewer calories (63 kcal vs 76 kcal).
- Filet de carrelet MSC has 54% less fat (0.6 g vs 1.3 g).
- Filet de carrelet MSC has no saturated fat, while Filet de carrelet has 0.3 g.
- Only Filet de carrelet lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Filet de carrelet MSC
Not available.
Filet de carrelet
filets de carrelet
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filet de carrelet MSC or Filet de carrelet?
Overall, Filet de carrelet MSC has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filet de carrelet MSC has fewer calories: 63 kcal versus 76 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filet de carrelet MSC has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.