Filet de carrelet MSC vs Filets de carrelets
Overall, Filet de carrelet MSC has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filet de carrelet MSC | Filets de carrelets |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 63 kcal | 76 kcal |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 1.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Protein | 14.4 g | 16 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filet de carrelet MSC has 17% fewer calories (63 kcal vs 76 kcal).
- Filet de carrelet MSC has 54% less fat (0.6 g vs 1.3 g).
- Filet de carrelet MSC has no saturated fat, while Filets de carrelets has 0.3 g.
Ingredients
Filet de carrelet MSC
Not available.
Filets de carrelets
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filet de carrelet MSC or Filets de carrelets?
Overall, Filet de carrelet MSC has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filet de carrelet MSC has fewer calories: 63 kcal versus 76 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filet de carrelet MSC has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.