MSC Filet de carrelet vs Filets de carrelets
Overall, Filets de carrelets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | MSC Filet de carrelet | Filets de carrelets |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 85 kcal | 76 kcal |
| Fat | 2 g | 1.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 1 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.3 g |
| Protein | 16 g | 16 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filets de carrelets has 11% fewer calories (76 kcal vs 85 kcal).
- Filets de carrelets has 35% less fat (1.3 g vs 2 g).
- Filets de carrelets has 70% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 1 g).
- Filets de carrelets has no sugar, while MSC Filet de carrelet has 1 g.
Ingredients
MSC Filet de carrelet
Not available.
Filets de carrelets
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: MSC Filet de carrelet or Filets de carrelets?
Overall, Filets de carrelets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filets de carrelets has fewer calories: 76 kcal versus 85 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filets de carrelets has less sugar: 0 g versus 1 g per 100 g.