Comparison
MSC Filet de carrelet vs Filets de carrelets
Overall, Filets de carrelets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | MSC Filet de carrelet | Filets de carrelets |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 82 kcal | 88 kcal |
| Fat | 2 g | 1.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 1 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 16 g | 18 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filets de carrelets has 25% less fat (1.5 g vs 2 g).
- Filets de carrelets has 50% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 1 g).
- Filets de carrelets has 50% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1 g).
- Filets de carrelets has 11% more protein (18 g vs 16 g).
- Only Filets de carrelets lists: Fish.
Ingredients
MSC Filet de carrelet
Not available.
Filets de carrelets
filets de carrelet (Pleuronectes platessa), eau.
FAQ
Which is healthier: MSC Filet de carrelet or Filets de carrelets?
Overall, Filets de carrelets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
MSC Filet de carrelet has fewer calories: 82 kcal versus 88 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filets de carrelets has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Filet de carrelet MSC vs Filets de carrelets
Filets de carrelets vs Filets de carrelets
MSC Filet de carrelet vs Filets De Carrelet
MSC Filet de carrelet vs Filets de carrelets
MSC Filet de carrelet vs MSC Filet de carrelet
Filets de carrelets vs Filet de carrelet
MSC Filet de carrelet vs Filet de carrelet
Filets De Carrelet vs Filets de carrelets