MSC Filet de carrelet vs Filet de carrelet
Overall, Filet de carrelet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | MSC Filet de carrelet | Filet de carrelet |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 82 kcal | 76 kcal |
| Fat | 2 g | 1.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 1 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 16 g | 16 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filet de carrelet has 35% less fat (1.3 g vs 2 g).
- Filet de carrelet has 70% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 1 g).
- Filet de carrelet has no sugar, while MSC Filet de carrelet has 1 g.
- Only Filet de carrelet lists: Fish.
Ingredients
MSC Filet de carrelet
Not available.
Filet de carrelet
filets de carrelet
FAQ
Which is healthier: MSC Filet de carrelet or Filet de carrelet?
Overall, Filet de carrelet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filet de carrelet has fewer calories: 76 kcal versus 82 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filet de carrelet has less sugar: 0 g versus 1 g per 100 g.