Comparison

MSC Filet de carrelet vs Filet de carrelet

Overall, Filet de carrelet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMSC Filet de carreletFilet de carrelet
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group — 1
Calories 82 kcal 76 kcal
Fat 2 g 1.3 g
Saturated fat 1 g 0.3 g
Sugars 1 g 0 g
Salt 0 g 0.3 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 16 g 16 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Filet de carrelet has 35% less fat (1.3 g vs 2 g).
  • Filet de carrelet has 70% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 1 g).
  • Filet de carrelet has no sugar, while MSC Filet de carrelet has 1 g.
  • Only Filet de carrelet lists: Fish.

Ingredients

MSC Filet de carrelet

Not available.

Filet de carrelet

filets de carrelet

FAQ

Which is healthier: MSC Filet de carrelet or Filet de carrelet?

Overall, Filet de carrelet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filet de carrelet has fewer calories: 76 kcal versus 82 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Filet de carrelet has less sugar: 0 g versus 1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons