Filet de bacon vs 6 Smoked Back Bacon Rashers
Overall, Filet de bacon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Filet de bacon
6 Smoked Back Bacon Rashers
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filet de bacon | 6 Smoked Back Bacon Rashers |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 123 kcal | 237 kcal |
| Fat | 3 g | 13 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.7 g | 5.6 g |
| Sugars | 1.2 g | 1.1 g |
| Salt | 2.8 g | 2.7 g |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 22.3 g | 28 g |
| Additives | 4 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filet de bacon has 48% fewer calories (123 kcal vs 237 kcal).
- Filet de bacon has 77% less fat (3 g vs 13 g).
- Filet de bacon has 70% less saturated fat (1.7 g vs 5.6 g).
- Filet de bacon has 99% more fiber (0.9 g vs 0 g).
- 6 Smoked Back Bacon Rashers has 20% more protein (28 g vs 22.3 g).
- Filet de bacon has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Filet de bacon
Filet de porc (Origine : France), sel, acidifiant: lactate de sodium, dextrose, correcteur d'acidité : citrates de sodium, sucre, arômes, arômes de fumée, antioxydant: ascorbate de sodium , conservateur : nitrite de sodium, Traces éventuelles de lait, de moutarde, de fruits à coque et de soja,
6 Smoked Back Bacon Rashers
British or Irish Pork (91%), Water, Salt, Natural Flavouring, Antioxidant: Ascorbic Acid, Smoke Flavouring.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filet de bacon or 6 Smoked Back Bacon Rashers?
Overall, Filet de bacon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filet de bacon has fewer calories: 123 kcal versus 237 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
6 Smoked Back Bacon Rashers has less sugar: 1.1 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.