Emincés de Bacon - Fumés vs 6 Smoked Back Bacon Rashers
Overall, Emincés de Bacon - Fumés has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Emincés de Bacon - Fumés
6 Smoked Back Bacon Rashers
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Emincés de Bacon - Fumés | 6 Smoked Back Bacon Rashers |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 109 kcal | 237 kcal |
| Fat | 2.3 g | 13 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.8 g | 5.6 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 1.1 g |
| Salt | 2.7 g | 2.7 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 22 g | 28 g |
| Additives | 3 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Emincés de Bacon - Fumés has 54% fewer calories (109 kcal vs 237 kcal).
- Emincés de Bacon - Fumés has 82% less fat (2.3 g vs 13 g).
- Emincés de Bacon - Fumés has 86% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 5.6 g).
- Emincés de Bacon - Fumés has 55% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.1 g).
- 6 Smoked Back Bacon Rashers has 21% more protein (28 g vs 22 g).
- Emincés de Bacon - Fumés has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Emincés de Bacon - Fumés
Noix de jambon de porc 88%, sel, dextrose, sirop de glucose, antioxydant : ascorbate de sodium, conservateurs : nitrite de sodium - nitrate de potassium, arômes naturels, épices.
6 Smoked Back Bacon Rashers
British or Irish Pork (91%), Water, Salt, Natural Flavouring, Antioxidant: Ascorbic Acid, Smoke Flavouring.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Emincés de Bacon - Fumés or 6 Smoked Back Bacon Rashers?
Overall, Emincés de Bacon - Fumés has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Emincés de Bacon - Fumés has fewer calories: 109 kcal versus 237 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Emincés de Bacon - Fumés has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.1 g per 100 g.