Fiambre de pá vs Thunfischfilets
Overall, Thunfischfilets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fiambre de pá | Thunfischfilets |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 1 |
| Calories | 101 kcal | 258 kcal |
| Fat | 3.5 g | 18.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.2 g | 2.8 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 4.7 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 16 g | 20.6 g |
| Additives | 6 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fiambre de pá has 61% fewer calories (101 kcal vs 258 kcal).
- Fiambre de pá has 81% less fat (3.5 g vs 18.7 g).
- Fiambre de pá has 21% less saturated fat (2.2 g vs 2.8 g).
- Thunfischfilets has 83% less sugar (0.1 g vs 0.6 g).
- Thunfischfilets has 79% less salt (1 g vs 4.7 g).
- Thunfischfilets has 22% more protein (20.6 g vs 16 g).
- Thunfischfilets is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Fiambre de pá
80% paleta de cerdo, agua, sal, emulgentes: trifosfatos, monogliceridos y digliceridos de acidos grasos; estabilizante: cloruro potásico; correctores de acidez: acetatos de sodio, ácido málico; maltodextrina, dextrosa, fibras vegetales (quisante, citricos, patata), gelificantes: algas tucheuma transformadas, honiac; antioxidante: ascorbato sódico; hemoglobina, conservador: nitrito
Thunfischfilets
100% chicken,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fiambre de pá or Thunfischfilets?
Overall, Thunfischfilets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fiambre de pá has fewer calories: 101 kcal versus 258 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Thunfischfilets has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.