Comparison

Farro alla mediterranea vs Vollkorncouscous

Overall, Vollkorncouscous has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFarro alla mediterraneaVollkorncouscous
Nutri-Score c a
NOVA group — 1
Calories 161 kcal 343 kcal
Fat 6.4 g 2.1 g
Saturated fat 1 g 0.4 g
Sugars 1.1 g 3.5 g
Salt 1.3 g 0 g
Fiber 4.1 g 8.2 g
Protein 3.9 g 12 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Farro alla mediterranea has 53% fewer calories (161 kcal vs 343 kcal).
  • Vollkorncouscous has 67% less fat (2.1 g vs 6.4 g).
  • Vollkorncouscous has 60% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 1 g).
  • Farro alla mediterranea has 69% less sugar (1.1 g vs 3.5 g).
  • Vollkorncouscous has 99% less salt (0 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Vollkorncouscous has 50% more fiber (8.2 g vs 4.1 g).
  • Vollkorncouscous has 68% more protein (12 g vs 3.9 g).
  • Vollkorncouscous has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Vollkorncouscous lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Farro alla mediterranea

Not available.

Vollkorncouscous

Semola di grano duro 100%

FAQ

Which is healthier: Farro alla mediterranea or Vollkorncouscous?

Overall, Vollkorncouscous has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Farro alla mediterranea has fewer calories: 161 kcal versus 343 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Farro alla mediterranea has less sugar: 1.1 g versus 3.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons