Farro alla mediterranea vs Vollkorncouscous
Overall, Vollkorncouscous has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Farro alla mediterranea | Vollkorncouscous |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 161 kcal | 343 kcal |
| Fat | 6.4 g | 2.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 1 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 1.1 g | 3.5 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 4.1 g | 8.2 g |
| Protein | 3.9 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Farro alla mediterranea has 53% fewer calories (161 kcal vs 343 kcal).
- Vollkorncouscous has 67% less fat (2.1 g vs 6.4 g).
- Vollkorncouscous has 60% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 1 g).
- Farro alla mediterranea has 69% less sugar (1.1 g vs 3.5 g).
- Vollkorncouscous has 99% less salt (0 g vs 1.3 g).
- Vollkorncouscous has 50% more fiber (8.2 g vs 4.1 g).
- Vollkorncouscous has 68% more protein (12 g vs 3.9 g).
- Vollkorncouscous has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Vollkorncouscous lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Farro alla mediterranea
Not available.
Vollkorncouscous
Semola di grano duro 100%
FAQ
Which is healthier: Farro alla mediterranea or Vollkorncouscous?
Overall, Vollkorncouscous has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Farro alla mediterranea has fewer calories: 161 kcal versus 343 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Farro alla mediterranea has less sugar: 1.1 g versus 3.5 g per 100 g.