Farine d'épeautre biologique vs Dinkelmehl Type 1050
Overall, Dinkelmehl Type 1050 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Farine d'épeautre biologique | Dinkelmehl Type 1050 |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 362 kcal | 341 kcal |
| Fat | 2.3 g | 1.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 1.3 g | 0.9 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 4.7 g | 5 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Nuts | Celery, Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Dinkelmehl Type 1050 has 30% less fat (1.6 g vs 2.3 g).
- Dinkelmehl Type 1050 has 31% less sugar (0.9 g vs 1.3 g).
- Only Farine d'épeautre biologique lists: Nuts.
- Only Dinkelmehl Type 1050 lists: Celery.
Ingredients
Farine d'épeautre biologique
Epeautre: Farine d'ÉPEAUTRE (BLÉ) biologique Traces éventuelles d'autres céréales contenant du gluten et de soja Grand épeautre: Farine d'ÉPEAUTRE (BLÉ) biologique Traces éventuelles d'autres céréales contenant du gluten
Dinkelmehl Type 1050
DINKELMEHL*¹ Type 1050 *aus biologischer Landwirtschaft ¹DINKEL IST EINE URWEIZENART. Kann Spuren von Soja, Milch, Mandel, Nüssen, Sellerie und Sesam enthalten.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Farine d'épeautre biologique or Dinkelmehl Type 1050?
Overall, Dinkelmehl Type 1050 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Dinkelmehl Type 1050 has fewer calories: 341 kcal versus 362 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Dinkelmehl Type 1050 has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 1.3 g per 100 g.