Farine de seigle type 130 vs Farine seigle T130
Overall, Farine de seigle type 130 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Farine de seigle type 130 | Farine seigle T130 |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 333 kcal | 345 kcal |
| Fat | 1.3 g | 2 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.3 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 4.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 9.5 g | 10.2 g |
| Protein | 9.1 g | 7.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Farine de seigle type 130 has 35% less fat (1.3 g vs 2 g).
- Farine seigle T130 has 76% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 1.3 g).
- Farine de seigle type 130 has 57% less sugar (2 g vs 4.6 g).
- Farine de seigle type 130 has 13% more protein (9.1 g vs 7.9 g).
Ingredients
Farine de seigle type 130
Farine de seigle t130
Farine seigle T130
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Farine de seigle type 130 or Farine seigle T130?
Overall, Farine de seigle type 130 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Farine de seigle type 130 has fewer calories: 333 kcal versus 345 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Farine de seigle type 130 has less sugar: 2 g versus 4.6 g per 100 g.