Farine de riz gluant vs Reismehl
Overall, Farine de riz gluant has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Farine de riz gluant | Reismehl |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 355 kcal | 352 kcal |
| Fat | 0.7 g | 2.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.2 g |
| Protein | 6.2 g | 7.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Farine de riz gluant has 68% less fat (0.7 g vs 2.2 g).
- Farine de riz gluant has 67% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 0.6 g).
- Farine de riz gluant has no sugar, while Reismehl has 0.7 g.
- Reismehl has 100% more fiber (2.2 g vs 0 g).
- Reismehl has 21% more protein (7.8 g vs 6.2 g).
Ingredients
Farine de riz gluant
Farine de riz d'u Sticky rice traditionnel 100% Farine de riz gluant blanc issu de l'agriculture biologique
Reismehl
Reisvollkornmehl
FAQ
Which is healthier: Farine de riz gluant or Reismehl?
Overall, Farine de riz gluant has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Reismehl has fewer calories: 352 kcal versus 355 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Farine de riz gluant has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.