Excellence Lait Extra Fondant vs Courage! Lait - Melk
Overall, Courage! Lait - Melk has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Excellence Lait Extra Fondan... | Courage! Lait - Melk |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 569 kcal | 528 kcal |
| Fat | 37 g | 29.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 23 g | 17.8 g |
| Sugars | 50 g | 56.1 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 3.3 g |
| Protein | 6.4 g | 7.9 g |
| Additives | 2 | 2 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk, Soybeans | Milk, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Courage! Lait - Melk has 20% less fat (29.4 g vs 37 g).
- Courage! Lait - Melk has 23% less saturated fat (17.8 g vs 23 g).
- Excellence Lait Extra Fondant has 11% less sugar (50 g vs 56.1 g).
- Courage! Lait - Melk has 19% more protein (7.9 g vs 6.4 g).
- Only Excellence Lait Extra Fondant lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Excellence Lait Extra Fondant
Sucre, beurre de cacao, poudre de lait, pâte de cacao, beurre laitier concentré, lactose, poudre de lait écrémé, extrait de malt d'orge, émulsifiant (lécithine de soja), arôme. Peut contenir des graines de sésame et des fruits à coque. Cacao: 30% minimum.
Courage! Lait - Melk
sugar, cocoa paste, powder whole milk powder, cocoa butter, whey powder (from milk ), concentrated butter, emulsifier (soya lecithin ), flavourings, concentrated butter,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Excellence Lait Extra Fondant or Courage! Lait - Melk?
Overall, Courage! Lait - Melk has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Courage! Lait - Melk has fewer calories: 528 kcal versus 569 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Excellence Lait Extra Fondant has less sugar: 50 g versus 56.1 g per 100 g.