Ethiquable Pindakaas vs Crema 100% Mandorle Piacersi Conad
Overall, Crema 100% Mandorle Piacersi Conad has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Ethiquable Pindakaas
Crema 100% Mandorle Piacersi Conad
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ethiquable Pindakaas | Crema 100% Mandorle Piacersi... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 576 kcal | 616 kcal |
| Fat | 48 g | 54 g |
| Saturated fat | 10 g | 5.3 g |
| Sugars | 5.9 g | 3.5 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 12 g |
| Protein | 25 g | 24 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Peanuts | Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ethiquable Pindakaas has 11% less fat (48 g vs 54 g).
- Crema 100% Mandorle Piacersi Conad has 47% less saturated fat (5.3 g vs 10 g).
- Crema 100% Mandorle Piacersi Conad has 41% less sugar (3.5 g vs 5.9 g).
- Crema 100% Mandorle Piacersi Conad has 94% less salt (0 g vs 0.5 g).
- Crema 100% Mandorle Piacersi Conad has 100% more fiber (12 g vs 0 g).
- Crema 100% Mandorle Piacersi Conad has the better Nutri-Score.
- Crema 100% Mandorle Piacersi Conad is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Ethiquable Pindakaas lists: Peanuts.
- Only Crema 100% Mandorle Piacersi Conad lists: Nuts.
Ingredients
Ethiquable Pindakaas
Arachide 95%, huile de tournesol, stéarine de palme, sel.
Crema 100% Mandorle Piacersi Conad
Mandorle 100%
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ethiquable Pindakaas or Crema 100% Mandorle Piacersi Conad?
Overall, Crema 100% Mandorle Piacersi Conad has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ethiquable Pindakaas has fewer calories: 576 kcal versus 616 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Crema 100% Mandorle Piacersi Conad has less sugar: 3.5 g versus 5.9 g per 100 g.