Mandel Creme vs Crema 100% Mandorle Piacersi Conad
Overall, Crema 100% Mandorle Piacersi Conad has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Mandel Creme | Crema 100% Mandorle Piacersi... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 1 |
| Calories | 596 kcal | 616 kcal |
| Fat | 41 g | 54 g |
| Saturated fat | 14 g | 5.3 g |
| Sugars | 48 g | 3.5 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.2 g | 12 g |
| Protein | 6.1 g | 24 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk, Nuts | Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Mandel Creme has 24% less fat (41 g vs 54 g).
- Crema 100% Mandorle Piacersi Conad has 62% less saturated fat (5.3 g vs 14 g).
- Crema 100% Mandorle Piacersi Conad has 93% less sugar (3.5 g vs 48 g).
- Crema 100% Mandorle Piacersi Conad has 90% more fiber (12 g vs 1.2 g).
- Crema 100% Mandorle Piacersi Conad has 75% more protein (24 g vs 6.1 g).
- Crema 100% Mandorle Piacersi Conad has the better Nutri-Score.
- Crema 100% Mandorle Piacersi Conad is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Mandel Creme lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Mandel Creme
Zucker, Sonnenblumenöl, Palmfett, 18% Mandeln, 8% gehackte Haselnusskerne, Magermilchpulver, Süßmolkenpulver, Laktose, Emulgator: Lecithine; natürliches Aroma. Kann Spuren von Soja, Erdnüssen und anderen Schalenfrüchten enthalten.
Crema 100% Mandorle Piacersi Conad
Mandorle 100%
FAQ
Which is healthier: Mandel Creme or Crema 100% Mandorle Piacersi Conad?
Overall, Crema 100% Mandorle Piacersi Conad has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Mandel Creme has fewer calories: 596 kcal versus 616 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Crema 100% Mandorle Piacersi Conad has less sugar: 3.5 g versus 48 g per 100 g.