Erwtensoep vs 33 P
Overall, Erwtensoep has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Erwtensoep | 33 P |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 60 kcal | 68 kcal |
| Fat | 1.5 g | 2.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 0.8 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 1.1 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.6 g |
| Protein | 5.2 g | 3.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Celery | Celery |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Erwtensoep has 12% fewer calories (60 kcal vs 68 kcal).
- Erwtensoep has 39% less fat (1.5 g vs 2.5 g).
- Erwtensoep has 27% more protein (5.2 g vs 3.8 g).
- Erwtensoep is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Erwtensoep
Water, spliterwten* (totaal erwten 20%). prei ui*, KNOLSELDERIJ*, varkensvlees* (7%), groene erwt doperwt, rookspek* (3%), zout, aardappelmeel*, SELDERI uienpoeder, peper*, bonenkruid*, nootmuskaat*, piment koriander*. = biologisch.
33 P
49% erwten, water, groenten (prei, ui, knolselderij, wortel, bladselderij), 8,0% rookworstschijfjes (varkensvlees 1* BLk, water, zout, dextrose, bouillon (aardappelzetmeel, gedroogde glucosestroop, aroma, gehydrolyseerd koolzaadeiwit, ui), specerijenextracten, kruidenextracten, rundercollageen, rookaroma, kruiden, specerijen), aardappel, gemodificeerd maiszetmeel, zout, raapzaadolie, natuurlijk aroma, specerijen, lavas
FAQ
Which is healthier: Erwtensoep or 33 P?
Overall, Erwtensoep has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Erwtensoep has fewer calories: 60 kcal versus 68 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Erwtensoep has less sugar: 1 g versus 1.1 g per 100 g.