Elderflower cordial vs Succo di mela e fiori sambuco biologico
Overall, Elderflower cordial has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Elderflower cordial
Succo di mela e fiori sambuco biologico
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Elderflower cordial | Succo di mela e fiori sambuc... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 1 |
| Calories | 18 kcal | 44 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 4.4 g | 10 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Elderflower cordial has 59% fewer calories (18 kcal vs 44 kcal).
- Elderflower cordial has 56% less sugar (4.4 g vs 10 g).
- Succo di mela e fiori sambuco biologico is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Elderflower cordial
sugar, spring water, elderflowers, citric acid, natural flavourings.
Succo di mela e fiori sambuco biologico
Succo di mela 99%, aroma naturale di fiori di sambuco, fiori di sambuco 0,01%
FAQ
Which is healthier: Elderflower cordial or Succo di mela e fiori sambuco biologico?
Overall, Elderflower cordial has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Elderflower cordial has fewer calories: 18 kcal versus 44 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Elderflower cordial has less sugar: 4.4 g versus 10 g per 100 g.