Comparison

Elderflower Cordial vs Squash 2 Litre

Overall, Squash 2 Litre has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientElderflower CordialSquash 2 Litre
Nutri-Score c b
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 96 kcal 19 kcal
Fat 0 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 22.1 g 4.7 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 0 g 0 g
Additives33
AllergensNone listedGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Squash 2 Litre has 80% fewer calories (19 kcal vs 96 kcal).
  • Squash 2 Litre has 79% less sugar (4.7 g vs 22.1 g).
  • Squash 2 Litre has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Squash 2 Litre lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Elderflower Cordial

Spring water, sugar, elderflower extract (4%), fructose, acid (Citric acid), Lemon juice from concentrate, flavourings, preservatives (sodium benzoate, Sodium metabisulphite).

Squash 2 Litre

water, sugar, mixed fruit juices from concentrate 10% (grape, blackcurrant, raspberry), acid (citric acid), vimto flavouring (natural extracts of fruits, herbs, barley malt and spices), colouring food (concentrates of carrot, hibiscus), acidity regulator (sodium citrate) vitamin c, sweeteners (sucralose, acesulfame k), vitamin d.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Elderflower Cordial or Squash 2 Litre?

Overall, Squash 2 Litre has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Squash 2 Litre has fewer calories: 19 kcal versus 96 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Squash 2 Litre has less sugar: 4.7 g versus 22.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons