Ei-bieslook salade vs Eiersalat
Overall, Eiersalat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ei-bieslook salade | Eiersalat |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 293 kcal | 321 kcal |
| Fat | 27.4 g | 30.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.6 g | 4 g |
| Sugars | 2.4 g | 2.4 g |
| Salt | 1.4 g | 1.4 g |
| Fiber | 0.1 g | 0.3 g |
| Protein | 7.8 g | 9.1 g |
| Additives | 10 | 3 |
| Allergens | Celery, Eggs, Mustard, Soybeans | Eggs, Mustard |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Eiersalat has 14% more protein (9.1 g vs 7.8 g).
- Only Ei-bieslook salade lists: Celery, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Ei-bieslook salade
63% gekookt ei van scharreleieren, koolzaadolie, water, suiker, natuurazijn, gepasteuriseerd eigeel,quot,, zout, gemodificeerd zetmeel (mais), 0,5% bieslook, zuurteregelaars: natriumacetaten, natriumlactaat, voedingszuren: citroenzuur, melkzuur, specerijen (bevat mosterd, selderij), conserveermiddelen: kaliumsorbaat, natriumbenzoaat, gistpoeder, natuurlijke aroma's, verdikkingsmiddelen: guarpitmeel, xanthaangom, melasse, kleurstof: carotenen, sojabonenpoeder, ¹- Beter Leven keurmerk 2 sterren,
Eiersalat
_Eier_ 67%, Rapsöl, _Eigelb_, Schnittlauch, Gewürze, Speisesalz, jodiertes Speiesalz, Zucker, _Senfsaat_, Branntweinessig, Säuerungsmittel Essigsäure, Säureregulator Natriumacetate, färbendes Karottenkonzentrat, Verdickungsmittel Guarkernmehl.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ei-bieslook salade or Eiersalat?
Overall, Eiersalat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ei-bieslook salade has fewer calories: 293 kcal versus 321 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ei-bieslook salade has less sugar: 2.4 g versus 2.4 g per 100 g.