Comparison

Écrasé de pomme de terre, patate douce et ciboulette vs Puree gourmande

Overall, Puree gourmande has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientÉcrasé de pomme de terre, pa...Puree gourmande
Nutri-Score b b
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 77 kcal 85 kcal
Fat 2.3 g 1.8 g
Saturated fat 1.6 g 1 g
Sugars 2.8 g 0.8 g
Salt 0.4 g 0.7 g
Fiber 2.1 g 1.8 g
Protein 1.5 g 5.4 g
Additives00
AllergensMilkMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Puree gourmande has 22% less fat (1.8 g vs 2.3 g).
  • Puree gourmande has 38% less saturated fat (1 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Puree gourmande has 71% less sugar (0.8 g vs 2.8 g).
  • Écrasé de pomme de terre, patate douce et ciboulette has 46% less salt (0.4 g vs 0.7 g).
  • Écrasé de pomme de terre, patate douce et ciboulette has 14% more fiber (2.1 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Puree gourmande has 72% more protein (5.4 g vs 1.5 g).

Ingredients

Écrasé de pomme de terre, patate douce et ciboulette

Pomme de terre cuite salée (pomme de terre 50,4%, sel), patate douce 33,3%, eau, crème liquide (lait), échalote, beurre (lait), ciboulette 0.3%. sel. poivre

Puree gourmande

Eau, lentilles corail* 20%, carottes* 16%, crème* entière stérilisée UHT 7%, sel marin, purée d'ail, cumin*. *Produits issus de l'agriculture biologique. Peut contenir des traces de gluten, soja, céleri et graines de sésame.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Écrasé de pomme de terre, patate douce et ciboulette or Puree gourmande?

Overall, Puree gourmande has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Écrasé de pomme de terre, patate douce et ciboulette has fewer calories: 77 kcal versus 85 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Puree gourmande has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 2.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons