Double Gloucester cheese vs Red Leicester
Overall, Red Leicester has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Double Gloucester cheese | Red Leicester |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 416 kcal | 403 kcal |
| Fat | 34.5 g | 33.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 24.3 g | 21.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 1.6 g | 1.7 g |
| Protein | 22.3 g | 25 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Red Leicester has 13% less saturated fat (21.1 g vs 24.3 g).
- Red Leicester has 11% more protein (25 g vs 22.3 g).
- Only Red Leicester lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Double Gloucester cheese
Not available.
Red Leicester
Red Leicester Cheese (Milk), Colour (Annatto)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Double Gloucester cheese or Red Leicester?
Overall, Red Leicester has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Red Leicester has fewer calories: 403 kcal versus 416 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Red Leicester has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.2 g per 100 g.