Comparison

Queso Azul Natural vs Red Leicester

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Queso Azul Natural	Red Leicester
Nutri-Score	e	d
NOVA group	3	4
Calories	331 kcal	403 kcal
Fat	28.1 g	33.6 g
Saturated fat	18.1 g	21.1 g
Sugars	0.1 g	0.1 g
Salt	3.5 g	1.7 g
Protein	19.4 g	25 g
Additives	0	1
Allergens	Milk	Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Queso Azul Natural has 18% fewer calories (331 kcal vs 403 kcal).
Queso Azul Natural has 16% less fat (28.1 g vs 33.6 g).
Queso Azul Natural has 14% less saturated fat (18.1 g vs 21.1 g).
Red Leicester has 51% less salt (1.7 g vs 3.5 g).
Red Leicester has 22% more protein (25 g vs 19.4 g).
Red Leicester has the better Nutri-Score.
Queso Azul Natural is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Queso Azul Natural

Latte vaccino, sale, fermenti lattici, caglio microbico, colture selezionate di muffe blu. Crosta edibile. Senza glutine.

Red Leicester

Red Leicester Cheese (Milk), Colour (Annatto)

FAQ

Which is healthier: Queso Azul Natural or Red Leicester?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Queso Azul Natural has fewer calories: 331 kcal versus 403 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Queso Azul Natural has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Queso Azul Natural vs Wensley Dale with cranbe... West Country Extra Matur... vs Red Leicester West Country Extra Matur... vs Queso Azul Natural Queso Azul Natural vs British 30% Less Fat Mat... Double Gloucester cheese vs Red Leicester Barber’s cruncher red le... vs Red Leicester British 30% Less Fat Mat... vs Red Leicester Double Gloucester cheese vs Red Leicester