Comparison
Dinkelmehl Type 1050 vs Dinkel Mehl Type 1050
Overall, Dinkelmehl Type 1050 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Dinkelmehl Type 1050 | Dinkel Mehl Type 1050 |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 345 kcal | 344 kcal |
| Fat | 1.2 g | 1.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 1.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 5.2 g | 5.2 g |
| Protein | 13 g | 12.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Dinkelmehl Type 1050 has 33% less fat (1.2 g vs 1.8 g).
- Dinkelmehl Type 1050 has 57% less sugar (0.6 g vs 1.4 g).
Ingredients
Dinkelmehl Type 1050
Dinkelmehl
Dinkel Mehl Type 1050
_Dinkelmehl_ Type 1050 aus biologischer Landwirtschaft
FAQ
Which is healthier: Dinkelmehl Type 1050 or Dinkel Mehl Type 1050?
Overall, Dinkelmehl Type 1050 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Dinkel Mehl Type 1050 has fewer calories: 344 kcal versus 345 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Dinkelmehl Type 1050 has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 1.4 g per 100 g.