Danablu pgi vs Caverna
Overall, Caverna has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Danablu pgi | Caverna |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 349 kcal | 366 kcal |
| Fat | 29.5 g | 30 g |
| Saturated fat | 19.1 g | 19 g |
| Sugars | 0.7 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 3 g | 1.6 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 20.2 g | 23 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Caverna has 86% less sugar (0.1 g vs 0.7 g).
- Caverna has 47% less salt (1.6 g vs 3 g).
- Caverna has 12% more protein (23 g vs 20.2 g).
- Caverna has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Danablu pgi lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Danablu pgi
Opastöriserad mjölk, salt, syrningskul - tur (innehåller mjölk), blåmögelkultur, ystenzym (innehåller mjölk). Ursprung mjölk: Danmark. *SGB = Skyddad geografisk beteckning.
Caverna
au Wartość odżywcza / Valores nutricionais médios w 100 g/ Por 100 g 1 porção (44 g** (44 g)* w 1 porcj / C Wartość energetyczna / Energia Thuszcz / Lípidos
FAQ
Which is healthier: Danablu pgi or Caverna?
Overall, Caverna has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Danablu pgi has fewer calories: 349 kcal versus 366 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Caverna has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.