Comparison

Danablu pgi vs Esrom

Overall, Esrom has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientDanablu pgiEsrom
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group — —
Calories 349 kcal 323 kcal
Fat 29.5 g 25 g
Saturated fat 19.1 g 16 g
Sugars 0.7 g 0.5 g
Salt 3 g 1.7 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 20.2 g 24 g
Additives00
AllergensMilkMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Esrom has 15% less fat (25 g vs 29.5 g).
  • Esrom has 16% less saturated fat (16 g vs 19.1 g).
  • Esrom has 43% less salt (1.7 g vs 3 g).
  • Esrom has 16% more protein (24 g vs 20.2 g).
  • Esrom has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Danablu pgi

Opastöriserad mjölk, salt, syrningskul - tur (innehåller mjölk), blåmögelkultur, ystenzym (innehåller mjölk). Ursprung mjölk: Danmark. *SGB = Skyddad geografisk beteckning.

Esrom

Hier öffnen wiederverschließbar 8030161 Dänische Käsespezialität ESROM 45+.g.g.A. MEINE KÄSETHEKE 2 Scheiben (44 g) enthalten** nach Originalrezept des dänischen Klosters Esrom kräftig-aromatisch Je 100 g: 1343 kJ/323 kcal + 1808 mild GEOGRAFI GOLDENER PREIS DLG www.DIG ORG Laktosefreit natürliche aromatisch kräftig

FAQ

Which is healthier: Danablu pgi or Esrom?

Overall, Esrom has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Esrom has fewer calories: 323 kcal versus 349 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Esrom has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons