Dandesan vs Esrom
Overall, Dandesan has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Dandesan | Esrom |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 323 kcal | 323 kcal |
| Fat | 25 g | 25 g |
| Saturated fat | 16 g | 16 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.7 g | 1.7 g |
| Protein | 23.5 g | 24 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Dandesan has no sugar, while Esrom has 0.5 g.
Ingredients
Dandesan
Pasteurisierte Milch, Salz, Käsereikulturen (enthalten Milch), mikrobieller Labaustauschstoff. Rinde zum Verzehr geeignet. 1Laktosegehalt <0,1g/100g.
Esrom
Hier öffnen wiederverschließbar 8030161 Dänische Käsespezialität ESROM 45+.g.g.A. MEINE KÄSETHEKE 2 Scheiben (44 g) enthalten** nach Originalrezept des dänischen Klosters Esrom kräftig-aromatisch Je 100 g: 1343 kJ/323 kcal + 1808 mild GEOGRAFI GOLDENER PREIS DLG www.DIG ORG Laktosefreit natürliche aromatisch kräftig
FAQ
Which is healthier: Dandesan or Esrom?
Overall, Dandesan has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Dandesan has fewer calories: 323 kcal versus 323 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Dandesan has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.