Danablu pgi vs Käse Esrom
Overall, Käse Esrom has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Danablu pgi | Käse Esrom |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 349 kcal | 323 kcal |
| Fat | 29.5 g | 25 g |
| Saturated fat | 19.1 g | 16 g |
| Sugars | 0.7 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 3 g | 1.7 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 20.2 g | 23.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Käse Esrom has 15% less fat (25 g vs 29.5 g).
- Käse Esrom has 16% less saturated fat (16 g vs 19.1 g).
- Käse Esrom has 86% less sugar (0.1 g vs 0.7 g).
- Käse Esrom has 44% less salt (1.7 g vs 3 g).
- Käse Esrom has 14% more protein (23.5 g vs 20.2 g).
- Käse Esrom has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Danablu pgi lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Danablu pgi
Opastöriserad mjölk, salt, syrningskul - tur (innehåller mjölk), blåmögelkultur, ystenzym (innehåller mjölk). Ursprung mjölk: Danmark. *SGB = Skyddad geografisk beteckning.
Käse Esrom
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Danablu pgi or Käse Esrom?
Overall, Käse Esrom has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Käse Esrom has fewer calories: 323 kcal versus 349 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Käse Esrom has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.