Caverna vs Käse Esrom
Overall, Käse Esrom has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Caverna | Käse Esrom |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 366 kcal | 323 kcal |
| Fat | 30 g | 25 g |
| Saturated fat | 19 g | 16 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 1.6 g | 1.7 g |
| Protein | 23 g | 23.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Käse Esrom has 12% fewer calories (323 kcal vs 366 kcal).
- Käse Esrom has 17% less fat (25 g vs 30 g).
- Käse Esrom has 16% less saturated fat (16 g vs 19 g).
Ingredients
Caverna
au Wartość odżywcza / Valores nutricionais médios w 100 g/ Por 100 g 1 porção (44 g** (44 g)* w 1 porcj / C Wartość energetyczna / Energia Thuszcz / Lípidos
Käse Esrom
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Caverna or Käse Esrom?
Overall, Käse Esrom has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Käse Esrom has fewer calories: 323 kcal versus 366 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Caverna has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.