Caverna vs Havarti
Overall, Caverna has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Caverna | Havarti |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 366 kcal | 422 kcal |
| Fat | 30 g | 38 g |
| Saturated fat | 19 g | 24 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.6 g | 2 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 23 g | 19 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Caverna has 13% fewer calories (366 kcal vs 422 kcal).
- Caverna has 21% less fat (30 g vs 38 g).
- Caverna has 21% less saturated fat (19 g vs 24 g).
- Caverna has 80% less sugar (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Caverna has 20% less salt (1.6 g vs 2 g).
- Caverna has 17% more protein (23 g vs 19 g).
- Only Havarti lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Caverna
au Wartość odżywcza / Valores nutricionais médios w 100 g/ Por 100 g 1 porção (44 g** (44 g)* w 1 porcj / C Wartość energetyczna / Energia Thuszcz / Lípidos
Havarti
Lait 98%, sel, ferments lactiques, enzyme coagulante
FAQ
Which is healthier: Caverna or Havarti?
Overall, Caverna has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Caverna has fewer calories: 366 kcal versus 422 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Caverna has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.