Comparison
Daifuku thé matcha vs Adukibonen
Overall, Adukibonen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Daifuku thé matcha | Adukibonen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 246 kcal | 329 kcal |
| Fat | 2.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 22.1 g | 2.4 g |
| Salt | — | 0 g |
| Fiber | 4 g | 12.7 g |
| Protein | 3.8 g | 19.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Daifuku thé matcha has 25% fewer calories (246 kcal vs 329 kcal).
- Adukibonen has 76% less fat (0.5 g vs 2.1 g).
- Adukibonen has 66% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 0.6 g).
- Adukibonen has 89% less sugar (2.4 g vs 22.1 g).
- Adukibonen has 69% more fiber (12.7 g vs 4 g).
- Adukibonen has 81% more protein (19.9 g vs 3.8 g).
Ingredients
Daifuku thé matcha
Not available.
Adukibonen
biologische adukibonen
FAQ
Which is healthier: Daifuku thé matcha or Adukibonen?
Overall, Adukibonen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Daifuku thé matcha has fewer calories: 246 kcal versus 329 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Adukibonen has less sugar: 2.4 g versus 22.1 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Trio gourmand Riz, lenti... vs Daifuku thé matcha
Haricots Azukis vs Daifuku thé matcha
Haricots azuki vs Daifuku thé matcha
Daifuku thé matcha vs Adzukibönor
Daifuku thé matcha vs Préparation d'haricot ro...
Haricots azuki vs Daifuku thé matcha
Trio gourmand Riz, lenti... vs Adukibonen
Haricots Azukis vs Adukibonen