Trio gourmand Riz, lentilles et haricots vs Daifuku thé matcha
Overall, Trio gourmand Riz, lentilles et haricots has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Trio gourmand Riz, lentilles et haricots
Daifuku thé matcha
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Trio gourmand Riz, lentilles... | Daifuku thé matcha |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 125 kcal | 246 kcal |
| Fat | 1.6 g | 2.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 0.4 g | 22.1 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | — |
| Fiber | 3.2 g | 4 g |
| Protein | 5.1 g | 3.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Trio gourmand Riz, lentilles et haricots has 49% fewer calories (125 kcal vs 246 kcal).
- Trio gourmand Riz, lentilles et haricots has 24% less fat (1.6 g vs 2.1 g).
- Trio gourmand Riz, lentilles et haricots has 66% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 0.6 g).
- Trio gourmand Riz, lentilles et haricots has 98% less sugar (0.4 g vs 22.1 g).
- Daifuku thé matcha has 20% more fiber (4 g vs 3.2 g).
- Trio gourmand Riz, lentilles et haricots has 25% more protein (5.1 g vs 3.8 g).
Ingredients
Trio gourmand Riz, lentilles et haricots
Eau, riz long étuvé* 19%, lentilles vertes* sec 9%, haricots azuki* sec 6%, huile de tournesol*, sel marin.
Daifuku thé matcha
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Trio gourmand Riz, lentilles et haricots or Daifuku thé matcha?
Overall, Trio gourmand Riz, lentilles et haricots has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Trio gourmand Riz, lentilles et haricots has fewer calories: 125 kcal versus 246 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Trio gourmand Riz, lentilles et haricots has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 22.1 g per 100 g.