Comparison

Croustillant fibres vs Croustillant Macadamia Raisins

Overall, Croustillant fibres has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCroustillant fibresCroustillant Macadamia Raisi...
Nutri-Score b b
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 406 kcal 420 kcal
Fat 11 g 13 g
Saturated fat 1.8 g 1.5 g
Sugars 15 g 15 g
Salt 0.1 g 0 g
Fiber 11 g 7.8 g
Protein 8.2 g 8.3 g
Additives21
AllergensGluten, NutsNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Croustillant fibres has 15% less fat (11 g vs 13 g).
  • Croustillant Macadamia Raisins has 17% less saturated fat (1.5 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Croustillant fibres has 29% more fiber (11 g vs 7.8 g).
  • Only Croustillant fibres lists: Gluten, Nuts.

Ingredients

Croustillant fibres

Flocons de seigle* complet 57%, Sucre de canne* non raffiné, Farine d'avoine*, Son d'avoine*, Noisettes* grillées 5%, Riz* extrudé (farine de riz*), Huile de tournesol*, Stabilisant : gomme d'acacia*, Flocons de noix de coco*, Sel marin, Antioxydant : extrait riche en tocophérols

Croustillant Macadamia Raisins

Flocons d’avoine* complète, Flocons de blé* complet, Farine de blé*, Sucre de canne* non raffiné, Riz* extrudé (farine de riz*), Huile de tournesol*, Noix de macadamia* 5%, Raisins* 5% (raisins*, huile de tournesol*), Mélasses*, Stabilisant: gomme d’acacia*, Antioxydant: extrait riche en tocophérols

FAQ

Which is healthier: Croustillant fibres or Croustillant Macadamia Raisins?

Overall, Croustillant fibres has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Croustillant fibres has fewer calories: 406 kcal versus 420 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Croustillant fibres has less sugar: 15 g versus 15 g per 100 g.

More comparisons