Croustibat Petits Trésors vs Colin d'Alaska façon Fish and Chips
Overall, Croustibat Petits Trésors has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Croustibat Petits Trésors
Colin d'Alaska façon Fish and Chips
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Croustibat Petits Trésors | Colin d'Alaska façon Fish an... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 230 kcal | 230 kcal |
| Fat | 11 g | 12 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.8 g | 0.9 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | 0.8 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 1 | 4 |
| Allergens | Fish, Gluten | Fish, Gluten, Milk, Mustard |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Croustibat Petits Trésors has 43% more fiber (1.4 g vs 0.8 g).
- Only Colin d'Alaska façon Fish and Chips lists: Milk, Mustard.
Ingredients
Croustibat Petits Trésors
Colin d'Alaska 51%, farine de blé, huile de colza, eau, amidon de blé, sel, stabilisant: méthylcellulose, épices, levure, arôme naturel.
Colin d'Alaska façon Fish and Chips
_Colin d'Alaska_ 48%, eau, huile de colza, chapelure (dont _blé_), farine de blé, amidon de pommes de terre, farine de maïs, amidon de maïs, sel, poudres à lever (diphosphates et carbonate de sodium), _lait_ écrémé en poudre, _moutarde_, ail en poudre.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Croustibat Petits Trésors or Colin d'Alaska façon Fish and Chips?
Overall, Croustibat Petits Trésors has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Croustibat Petits Trésors has fewer calories: 230 kcal versus 230 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Croustibat Petits Trésors has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.