Comparison

Crème de saumon rose du Pacifique à l'estragon vs Salmón al natural

Overall, Salmón al natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCrème de saumon rose du Paci...Salmón al natural
Nutri-Score c b
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 233 kcal 143 kcal
Fat 19 g 7.5 g
Saturated fat 2.4 g 1.4 g
Sugars 0.8 g 0.5 g
Salt 1.2 g 1.2 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 12 g 17 g
Additives00
AllergensFishFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Salmón al natural has 39% fewer calories (143 kcal vs 233 kcal).
  • Salmón al natural has 61% less fat (7.5 g vs 19 g).
  • Salmón al natural has 42% less saturated fat (1.4 g vs 2.4 g).
  • Salmón al natural has 38% less sugar (0.5 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Salmón al natural has 29% more protein (17 g vs 12 g).
  • Salmón al natural has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Salmón al natural is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Crème de saumon rose du Pacifique à l'estragon

Filets de _saumon_ rose du Pacifique (48%), eau, huile de colza, huile d'olive vierge extra, jus de citron, aromates dont estragon (0,3%), concentré de tomate, fécule de manioc, oignons fumés rissolés, sel, fibre de chicorée, huile de pépin de raisin fumée, extrait de levure, épices

Salmón al natural

Salmón, agua, sal.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Crème de saumon rose du Pacifique à l'estragon or Salmón al natural?

Overall, Salmón al natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Salmón al natural has fewer calories: 143 kcal versus 233 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Salmón al natural has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons