Comparison
Côtes de Blettes coupées vs Bieta al naturale
Overall, Côtes de Blettes coupées has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Côtes de Blettes coupées | Bieta al naturale |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 22 kcal | 17 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.7 g | 2.1 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2.4 g | 1.4 g |
| Protein | 2.2 g | 1.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bieta al naturale has 23% fewer calories (17 kcal vs 22 kcal).
- Côtes de Blettes coupées has 67% less sugar (0.7 g vs 2.1 g).
- Bieta al naturale has 94% less salt (0 g vs 0.4 g).
- Côtes de Blettes coupées has 42% more fiber (2.4 g vs 1.4 g).
- Côtes de Blettes coupées has 32% more protein (2.2 g vs 1.5 g).
Ingredients
Côtes de Blettes coupées
Côtes de blettes
Bieta al naturale
Bietola
FAQ
Which is healthier: Côtes de Blettes coupées or Bieta al naturale?
Overall, Côtes de Blettes coupées has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bieta al naturale has fewer calories: 17 kcal versus 22 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Côtes de Blettes coupées has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 2.1 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Côtes de Blettes coupées vs Acelgas Extra
Côtes de Blettes coupées vs Acelga
Côtes de Blettes coupées vs Acelga hoja en porciones
Bieta al naturale vs Acelgas Extra
Bieta al naturale vs Acelga
Bieta al naturale vs Acelga hoja en porciones
Blettes vs Bieta al naturale
Côtes de Blettes coupées vs Acelgas