Comparison
Bieta al naturale vs Acelga
Overall, Bieta al naturale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bieta al naturale | Acelga |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 17 kcal | 29 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 2.1 g | 0.9 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | 0.8 g |
| Protein | 1.5 g | 2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bieta al naturale has 41% fewer calories (17 kcal vs 29 kcal).
- Acelga has 57% less sugar (0.9 g vs 2.1 g).
- Bieta al naturale has 95% less salt (0 g vs 0.4 g).
- Bieta al naturale has 43% more fiber (1.4 g vs 0.8 g).
- Acelga has 25% more protein (2 g vs 1.5 g).
Ingredients
Bieta al naturale
Bietola
Acelga
Acelga,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bieta al naturale or Acelga?
Overall, Bieta al naturale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bieta al naturale has fewer calories: 17 kcal versus 29 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Acelga has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 2.1 g per 100 g.