Comparison
Acelgas vs Acelga
Overall, Acelga has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Acelgas | Acelga |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 10 kcal | 29 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.9 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.8 g |
| Protein | 0.7 g | 2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Acelgas has 66% fewer calories (10 kcal vs 29 kcal).
- Acelga has 60% less fat (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Acelgas has 44% less sugar (0.5 g vs 0.9 g).
- Acelga has 49% less salt (0.4 g vs 0.9 g).
- Acelga has 65% more protein (2 g vs 0.7 g).
Ingredients
Acelgas
Not available.
Acelga
Acelga,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Acelgas or Acelga?
Overall, Acelga has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Acelgas has fewer calories: 10 kcal versus 29 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Acelgas has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.