Comparison
Côtes de Blettes coupées vs Acelga
Overall, Côtes de Blettes coupées has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Côtes de Blettes coupées | Acelga |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 22 kcal | 29 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.7 g | 0.9 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | 2.4 g | 0.8 g |
| Protein | 2.2 g | 2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Côtes de Blettes coupées has 24% fewer calories (22 kcal vs 29 kcal).
- Côtes de Blettes coupées has 67% more fiber (2.4 g vs 0.8 g).
Ingredients
Côtes de Blettes coupées
Côtes de blettes
Acelga
Acelga,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Côtes de Blettes coupées or Acelga?
Overall, Côtes de Blettes coupées has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Côtes de Blettes coupées has fewer calories: 22 kcal versus 29 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Côtes de Blettes coupées has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.