Comparison

Côtes de Blettes coupées vs Acelga hoja en porciones

Overall, Côtes de Blettes coupées has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCôtes de Blettes coupéesAcelga hoja en porciones
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 1 1
Calories 22 kcal 18 kcal
Fat 0 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.1 g
Sugars 0.7 g 0.4 g
Salt 0.4 g 0.2 g
Fiber 2.4 g 1.6 g
Protein 2.2 g 1.9 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Côtes de Blettes coupées has no fat, while Acelga hoja en porciones has 0.5 g.
  • Côtes de Blettes coupées has 33% more fiber (2.4 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Côtes de Blettes coupées has 14% more protein (2.2 g vs 1.9 g).

Ingredients

Côtes de Blettes coupées

Côtes de blettes

Acelga hoja en porciones

Acelga.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Côtes de Blettes coupées or Acelga hoja en porciones?

Overall, Côtes de Blettes coupées has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Acelga hoja en porciones has fewer calories: 18 kcal versus 22 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Acelga hoja en porciones has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons