Comparison
Blettes vs Acelga hoja en porciones
Overall, Acelga hoja en porciones has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Blettes | Acelga hoja en porciones |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 11 kcal | 18 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 1.3 g | 0.4 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 1.3 g | 1.6 g |
| Protein | 0.8 g | 1.9 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Blettes has 40% fewer calories (11 kcal vs 18 kcal).
- Blettes has no fat, while Acelga hoja en porciones has 0.5 g.
- Acelga hoja en porciones has 69% less sugar (0.4 g vs 1.3 g).
- Acelga hoja en porciones has 82% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.8 g).
- Acelga hoja en porciones has 19% more fiber (1.6 g vs 1.3 g).
- Acelga hoja en porciones has 59% more protein (1.9 g vs 0.8 g).
- Acelga hoja en porciones is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Blettes
Blettes, eau, sel, acidifiant : acide citrique, antioxydant : acide ascorbique.
Acelga hoja en porciones
Acelga.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Blettes or Acelga hoja en porciones?
Overall, Acelga hoja en porciones has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Blettes has fewer calories: 11 kcal versus 18 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Acelga hoja en porciones has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 1.3 g per 100 g.