Confiture de fruits rouges 65% de fruits vs Fruits rouges
Overall, Fruits rouges has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Confiture de fruits rouges 65% de fruits
Fruits rouges
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Confiture de fruits rouges 6... | Fruits rouges |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 168 kcal | 164 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 38 g | 36.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.9 g | 1.3 g |
| Protein | 0.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fruits rouges has 80% less fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Confiture de fruits rouges 65% de fruits has 32% more fiber (1.9 g vs 1.3 g).
- Fruits rouges has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Confiture de fruits rouges 65% de fruits
Sucre, fraise 25%, cassis2%, gélifiant: pectines, jus de citron concentré
Fruits rouges
60% fruits (22% fraises, 17% griottes, 14% framboises, 5% groseilles, 2% cassis), sucre, eau, jus de citron concentré, gélifiant: pectines
FAQ
Which is healthier: Confiture de fruits rouges 65% de fruits or Fruits rouges?
Overall, Fruits rouges has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fruits rouges has fewer calories: 164 kcal versus 168 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fruits rouges has less sugar: 36.6 g versus 38 g per 100 g.